Chapter 1: The Reality of Our Waste

Imagine if you had to confront the trash you generate every day. On average, an American produces around 5 pounds of waste daily, accumulating nearly 1,800 pounds annually. However, most people don’t witness the fate of their garbage. When trash is disposed of in public spaces such as offices or schools, it's typically cleared away nightly, leaving behind a fresh bag — often with minimal contents. At home, trash disappears within the week.

It’s interesting that we refer to disposing of items as "throwing them away." We avoid saying they’re destined for a landfill, as that specific truth may be uncomfortable. The trash goes away from us, and we prefer not to think about its aftermath.

Now, consider if you were required to stack your garbage on your front porch or in your garage for weeks or even months. If you had a heap of plastic, styrofoam, and spoiled food outside your door, would you reconsider how you view your waste? The sight of trash strewn about might alter your perspective on disposal.

Regardless of whether you’re an ardent recycler or someone who casually discards items, many of us remain unaware of what truly happens to our waste. We often assume it’s either neatly tucked away in landfills or efficiently processed for recycling. After all, ignorance can be comforting.

However, the truth is complex. A significant portion of what people place in recycling bins never gets recycled. This confusion stems partly from a lack of understanding — even those who are eco-conscious are often uncertain about recycling guidelines. Questions like, "How clean does it need to be?" or "Can I include the bottle cap?" frequently arise.

This ambiguity is not accidental. The plastics industry has labeled products with recycling symbols, suggesting that they are recyclable, even when many of these items fail to be recycled in real-world scenarios. This tactic allows consumers to feel their purchases are environmentally friendly, when they often are not.

A Frontline documentary revealed that the introduction of these symbols was a calculated response to criticism faced by the plastics industry in the late 20th century. By marking their products as recyclable, they aimed to create the illusion that plastics wouldn’t contribute to landfill issues.

With this confusion surrounding recycling, many of us engage in "wishcycling," tossing various items into recycling bins, hoping someone else will sort them properly. This behavior not only wastes the time of recycling facility workers but can also contaminate genuinely recyclable materials, making them less likely to be processed effectively. Since this occurs out of sight, we remain unconcerned, believing we’ve done our part by recycling.

The consequences of our waste are significant. Countless animals consume tiny plastic particles or become ensnared in plastic debris. In the oceans, there are five major gyres filled with floating plastics, with the Pacific patch alone containing 1.8 trillion pieces. Much of this waste eventually sinks to the ocean floor, mingling with sediment. Food waste in landfills generates greenhouse gases, contributing emissions equivalent to 42 coal power plants.

Yet, because these issues occur far from our everyday lives, we often choose to ignore them.

It's not limited to waste; our society has been structured to shield us from the repercussions of our choices.

When you think about the animals that provide our meat, dairy, and eggs, what images come to mind? Perhaps a picturesque farm with green fields and a quaint barn? Many don’t consider the reality; the animal agriculture industry ensures we remain detached from the process. A boneless, skinless chicken breast is packaged and marketed to be perceived as a mere grocery item rather than a former living creature.

You're not encouraged to associate the chickens on your plate with real birds or to reflect on the origins of the oats in your cereal or the palm oil in your chocolate.

If you did connect these dots, you might realize that 99% of the 10 billion animals raised in the U.S. annually are subjected to factory farming. This includes 99.97% of chickens, 99% of turkeys, 98% of pigs, and 70% of cows. These factory farms often provide horrific conditions, leading to immense suffering for the animals. For instance, when chickens become overly stressed and start harming each other, the solution is not to improve their environment but to perform painful beak amputations without anesthesia.

For those who consume meat, the realities of factory farming often go unexamined. This is largely because we’re not required to confront these issues, and the meat industry actively discourages scrutiny. In many regions, it’s illegal to document and disseminate information about the conditions on factory farms. Those who attempt to expose the truth can face legal repercussions.

Despite the fact that the majority of meat consumed in America comes from operations that mistreat both animals and workers, leading to significant suffering, we remain oblivious. We can conveniently buy our pre-packaged chicken or ground beef without having to consider its origin.

Climate change, our most pressing environmental challenge, mirrors this dynamic. Those contributing to climate change are often insulated from its daily impacts.

We’re already witnessing its effects. Many people over-rely on air conditioning to combat rising temperatures, creating an environment so cold that it can be uncomfortable for those dressed for outdoor conditions. They idle in oversized vehicles, keeping the air conditioning running while waiting in long drive-thru lines, oblivious to the carbon emissions their actions produce, exacerbating future heatwaves.

Most individuals in affluent countries, unless they live in high-risk areas for wildfires or hurricanes, will likely evade the most severe effects of climate change. They may face minor inconveniences and economic stagnation, but they remain largely shielded and comfortable. Many won’t worry about food security or extreme heat conditions; they can simply crank up the air conditioning or travel to cooler destinations.

It's profoundly unjust that those most responsible for the crisis are often the least affected by its consequences.

While it's unreasonable to expect individuals to meticulously analyze every consumer choice (though it would make for a memorable skit), it’s crucial to acknowledge how our society is designed to obscure these issues. We should question who benefits from this structure and who suffers as a result.

The first video, "All the Light We Cannot See | Official Trailer | Netflix," offers a glimpse into the unseen realities of our world, paralleling the themes discussed above.

In the second video, "All the Light We Cannot See | Lisa's Study Guides," we delve deeper into understanding the implications of our choices and the hidden narratives behind them.

Thanks for engaging with this content! If you're interested in receiving updates whenever I publish a new article, click here. I also write a newsletter called "Looking Through the Past," which focuses on historical artifacts and images — feel free to check it out! You can support my work by "buying me a cup of coffee" here.