The Surprising Bias in Coin Tosses Revealed by New Research
Written on
Chapter 1: The Fairness of Coin Tosses
Is a coin flip genuinely a random event? Recent studies suggest otherwise, indicating that one side may appear more frequently than the other. A research team from various European institutions revisited this topic and found that the conventional belief in the fairness of coin tosses may be flawed.
Historically, flipping a coin has been a popular means of resolving conflicts. This method dates back to ancient civilizations, including Rome and Greece, where it was viewed as a random game, considered relatively equitable—assuming the coin itself was unbiased.
Section 1.1: Understanding Coin Toss Probabilities
Traditionally, it was assumed that the chances of landing heads or tails were equal at 50%. Previous studies aimed to test this theory. Notably, in 2007, researchers Perci Diaconis, Susan Holmes, and Richard Montgomery suggested that the initial side of the coin tossed was more likely to land face up.
“We investigated the natural process of tossing a coin. Our findings indicate that coins thrown with more force tend to return closer to their starting position. The probability stands at around 51%,” the researchers reported years ago.
In their analysis, the authors pointed out that earlier studies focused only on the equal probability of heads or tails, neglecting the likelihood of the coin landing on the same side that initiated the toss.
Subsection 1.1.1: The Importance of Initial Conditions
Recent research confirmed that the orientation of the coin during the toss plays a significant role. The phenomenon of precession—where the axis of rotation of a spinning object shifts—was identified as a factor that can influence the outcome.
A collaborative group of scientists from multiple European institutions decided to further investigate the findings of Diaconis and his team. They conducted extensive experiments with 48 participants tossing a total of 350,757 coins minted from 46 different countries to eliminate bias.
Section 1.2: Confirming the Findings
The researchers discovered that their results aligned closely with those of the earlier study. In fact, they found that in 50.8% of the cases, the coin landed on the same side it started from.
“Our data robustly supports this theory. Coins indeed tend to land more frequently on the side that was initially facing up. Additionally, our findings confirm that when a fair coin is tossed with its starting side randomly determined, there remains an equal chance of achieving heads or tails. However, we present compelling evidence that when people toss a fair coin, it often lands on the starting side,” the article on “arXiv” noted.
The researchers acknowledge that although the discrepancy is small, it suggests that coin tossing is not an entirely fair process. If a person could consistently choose the starting side of the coin, they would statistically have nearly a 51% chance of predicting the outcome correctly. It may be prudent to incorporate another random method before the toss to ensure fairness in the selection of the starting side.
Chapter 2: Exploring the Implications of the Findings
In the video titled "Scientists Just Proved Coin Tosses Are Flawed Using 350,757 Coin Flips," researchers delve into the intricacies of coin tossing and its unexpected biases, providing a deeper understanding of randomness.
Additionally, the video "The Gambler's Fallacy: The Physics of Coin Tosses (4/6)" explores the misconceptions surrounding gambling probabilities, including the science behind coin tosses.
Attention all readers!
As content creators on Medium.com, we often face challenges regarding fair compensation for our work. If you appreciate my articles, please consider supporting me on my “Buy Me a Coffee” page. Your small contributions greatly assist in my efforts to produce quality content. Thank you for your support!