# OpenAI's ChatGPT Faces New Rivals: A Deep Dive Into the Competition
Written on
Chapter 1: The Rise of New Chatbot Competitors
The dominance of ChatGPT is increasingly under threat due to the emergence and enhancements of alternative chatbots. Notably, Bard has recently introduced features unavailable to ChatGPT users, while Claude is capable of performing tasks comparable to ChatGPT and Bard—along with some exclusive functions reserved for ChatGPT's paid version. This situation should raise alarms for OpenAI.
To understand this competition more thoroughly, let’s examine how Claude and Bard stack up against ChatGPT.
Section 1.1: The Cost Factor
It’s important to highlight that ChatGPT’s rivals are not only free to use but also provide some features typically found in ChatGPT's paid tiers at no cost.
- Claude: Free
- Bard: Free
- GPT-3.5: Free
- GPT-4: $20/month
While it’s likely that Claude and Bard will not remain free indefinitely, their current offerings pose a significant challenge to ChatGPT as long as they provide features that are either restricted to ChatGPT Plus users or entirely absent from ChatGPT.
Section 1.2: Feature Comparison
All three chatbots can perform coding tasks without charge. We already have insights into how ChatGPT and Bard handle coding, so let’s see Claude’s capabilities in action. For instance, when tasked with generating code for a simple game, Claude delivered a clear Python script almost instantly.
Claude’s abilities go beyond coding; it supports file uploads (like PDFs and Word documents), a feature not available to basic ChatGPT users. For example, I converted a text from a website into a PDF, asked Claude to summarize it, and received a concise summary in just 11 seconds for a 247-word document.
Additionally, Claude excels at multitasking, whether it involves data analysis or translation. When I requested a translation of the same text into Spanish, Claude delivered the result quickly.
Meanwhile, Bard has introduced a robust image recognition feature recently, which ChatGPT lacks. This update enhances Bard’s usability across various applications.
Section 1.3: Up-to-Date Knowledge
Claude’s training data is more recent compared to ChatGPT’s. According to Anthropic, Claude was trained on data up to December 2022 and may even include some early 2023 events, while ChatGPT's knowledge is limited to September 2021. Consequently, if you inquire about events from 2022 using the free version of ChatGPT, you may not receive accurate information, whereas both Claude and Bard will provide relevant insights.
Section 1.4: Performance Speed
Speed is another crucial factor in choosing a chatbot. Claude demonstrates impressive speed; for instance, it generated 100 words in 8 seconds, which is comparable to GPT-4, which produced the same amount in 7 seconds.
In a different test, Claude generated 1000 words in just 1 minute and 24 seconds, showcasing its efficiency.
While Claude's speed is commendable, it’s important to note that it isn’t without its drawbacks.
Chapter 2: Limitations of Claude
Despite its strengths, Claude has certain limitations. Currently, it is only available to users in the US and UK, whereas ChatGPT has a presence in 159 countries.
Additionally, Claude's language support is limited to English. While it can assist with translations in popular languages like Spanish or German, its overall language capabilities are significantly less extensive than those of ChatGPT, which supports over 80 languages, and Bard, which accommodates 40 languages.
In conclusion, while Claude and Bard present formidable competition to ChatGPT, particularly in terms of cost, features, and up-to-date knowledge, they also come with their own sets of limitations that users should consider.