The Looming Threat of Europe's Deindustrialization: A Cautionary Tale
Written on
Chapter 1: An Unforeseen Crisis
The current situation in Europe was entirely predictable. The sanctions imposed on Russian energy were bound to create an adverse reaction. It’s akin to injuring oneself in an attempt to harm another; the repercussions are devastating for the instigator. The European economy is now precariously positioned due to soaring energy costs, while the United States appears to be in a more advantageous position, a development many saw coming.
The U.S. has been supplying Europe with LNG at inflated prices, all while European nations celebrate these deals, seemingly oblivious to the fact that they are being exploited. Additionally, the U.S. is profiting from military sales as NATO countries boost their defense budgets to replenish supplies given to Ukraine.
Amidst this turmoil, European nations are struggling to manage an influx of refugees, with numbers surpassing those from the early 2010s. Meanwhile, the U.S. remains insulated across the ocean, unfazed by these challenges.
The Financial Times highlights how America is actively attracting industries from the EU through an enticing mix of subsidies and lower energy costs. The burden of this situation has fallen disproportionately on Europe, which is now witnessing a significant decline in industrial capacity. This trend was evident ten months ago, yet EU leadership seems to be doubling down with yet another package of sanctions, despite the ineffectiveness of the previous eight.
As Europe endures rolling electricity blackouts, communication outages, and a significant increase in excess deaths—first from summer heat and soon from winter cold—the reality is grim. Additionally, hundreds of thousands of jobs are vanishing, forcing employees to work in winter attire indoors. This is the new normal in Europe, and leaders appear without viable solutions, particularly if reversing sanctions isn’t an option.
Instead, they resort to purchasing Russian energy at exorbitant prices after it has been refined in countries like India or Azerbaijan. Despite their extensive education and understanding of the situation, European leaders continue to virtue signal, claiming a need to "take a stand" while secretly acquiring these resources at inflated costs.
A significant portion of the European populace now describes their financial situation as "precarious." Those who voice dissent are often labeled as "far right" or “Putin Apologists,” contributing to the rise of extremist parties in countries like Sweden and Italy, a predictable consequence of the current unrest.
Section 1.1: Economic Ramifications
The Financial Times has recently published a series of articles analyzing the detrimental economic effects of these sanctions. Unlike many mainstream outlets, they present a straightforward account, yet they shy away from proposing solutions or questioning the wisdom of these sanctions.
They caution that Europe risks a massive deindustrialization, as voiced by Belgium's Prime Minister Alexander De Croo. Europe, often romanticized for its historic cities and robust healthcare systems, is also home to significant industrial activity. Notably, Germany serves as a crucial player, but across the continent, industries employ around 35 million individuals—15% of the workforce—across various sectors, from chemicals to steel.
However, the EU's industrial strength has relied heavily on affordable energy imports. Without access to this, European industries struggle to compete globally. The European Round Table for Industry recently warned that escalating energy prices threaten the competitiveness of industrial energy consumers. If not addressed, the damage could become irreparable.
Section 1.2: The Path Forward
Many industries are already reducing their production capacities or seeking to relocate to regions with more favorable energy costs. The trend witnessed between 2010 and 2014, when industries moved to the Middle East and North Africa due to high European gas prices, could repeat itself, but on a much larger scale.
To maintain manufacturing and keep domestic products competitive, Europe may need to impose tariffs on imports. This could preserve some jobs but would also reduce the purchasing power of European citizens, ultimately affecting their standard of living.
In an effort to address these challenges, French President Macron has proposed a Buy European Act, but its potential impact remains uncertain. Meanwhile, the EU has established a task force to "resolve differences" with the U.S. while American industries benefit from the war through inflated sales of gas and weapons.
Chapter 2: The Wider Implications
The first video titled "Europe Is Losing Its Factories" delves into the ongoing challenges faced by European industries as they grapple with the fallout from sanctions and rising energy costs.
The second video, "Europe's Deindustrialization: Ukraine War's Ripple Effect," explores the broader impacts of the Ukraine conflict on European industrial capacity and economic stability.
The Confederation of British Industry has warned that the U.K. faces stagflation, marked by soaring inflation and negative growth. Without decisive action, the continent may face a lost decade of economic growth.
The reality is stark: Europe must recognize that America is not a reliable ally. The options are limited; they can impose tariffs or drastically increase subsidies for energy, but both are unsustainable in the long term. The combined effects of COVID and self-imposed sanctions have left government budgets in disarray, with debt levels reminiscent of the 1920s.
As Europe seeks alternatives, the window for retaining energy-intensive industries is closing. The current discourse largely ignores the most straightforward solution—rolling back sanctions.
It is critical to understand that the moral stance against purchasing Russian energy is undermined by the fact that these resources are being obtained through third parties at inflated prices. Furthermore, the sanctions inadvertently elevate global prices, enriching the Kremlin.
The humanitarian crisis in Ukraine, while severe, is not the worst ongoing crisis globally; Yemen suffers under a much darker reality, yet the West continues to support the Saudi-led coalition. This hypocrisy is glaring, and the moral arguments seem hollow.
A more open dialogue and negotiations are essential to resolve the Ukraine conflict and restore reasonable business relations. Instead, the world is being divided into a West versus Rest scenario, as countries increasingly turn away from Western hegemony.
Europe stands on the brink of a lost decade, with the potential for widespread job losses and a significant decline in living standards. This crisis, largely avoidable, highlights the pressing need for re-evaluation of current policies and strategies.