Chapter 1: The Question of Existence

What if Jesus truly sacrificed himself for your salvation?

To embrace Christianity, one must first accept a fundamental truth: humans are not rulers but rather subjects of a greater power. Imagine, for a moment, that Jesus is alive today, patiently awaiting your response to his love. It may seem unfathomable to disregard such a notion, yet human nature reveals a remarkable tendency to overlook uncomfortable truths. Even concepts that are central to our existence can be rationalized away, especially when they challenge our understanding of life. This denial of reality is nothing short of absurd. Our inability to confront our ignorance is a striking failure of humanity.

This inquiry serves as the foundation for some of life’s most pressing questions, initiated with "if." There is no security in dismissing meaning for the fleeting comfort of ignorance. This tendency illustrates that we, as a species, often prefer to fabricate comforting narratives rather than confront inconvenient truths. This attitude extends to how we regard innocent lives, which we can conveniently dismiss as burdensome, leading to their marginalization, ridicule, and even destruction.

Are you prepared to hold anyone accountable? If so, consider those who threaten the innocence of children. What does it say about you if you refuse to entertain thoughts that might challenge your self-affirming beliefs, tossing aside lives that are not your own for convenience? You may argue that it is established science, yet this represents a fundamental misunderstanding of what science should be: a guide for ethical decision-making, devoid of moral indifference.

Many resort to a “scientific” dehumanization of others, mirroring historical atrocities. One would think that the thought of such actions would provoke serious reflection before engaging in the indiscriminate slaughter of innocents.

So, how does this apply to Jesus? Many easily dismiss him, using this as justification for living in blissful ignorance. Yet, let’s consider for a moment: who genuinely lacks meaning in their own life? Such individuals are often deemed mentally or spiritually unwell. They would forfeit their desires and existence if it inconvenienced another. This mentality is common in victims of emotional manipulation, where self-harm is weaponized to elicit sympathy.

Now apply this to rational thinking. True rationality would assert that every life possesses intrinsic value, deserving at least a moment of consideration. However, we often fail to recognize the needs of others when it benefits us to dehumanize them. How does this relate to your thoughts on Jesus? Engaging with his words necessitates acknowledging an uncomfortable truth: we cannot justify our actions while marginalizing any human life.

Why should we even discuss Jesus? Can we not recognize human value without referencing a figure whose existence some question? I chose Jesus as a benchmark for the discourse surrounding human value because, despite the contention, his story compels us to consider its implications for life’s worth.

The narrative of Jesus’ sacrificial death for humanity’s sake profoundly elevates the value of life. So why do we shy away from this dialogue? Is it because we desire to maintain our convenience, allowing us to overlook that which we can rationalize as “unscientific” in our enlightened, evolved minds?

The issue at hand is not the existence of a Creator but rather His personhood...

Consider any narrative—how does science relate to questions like whether a man could die and return to life, or whether a fetus is indeed a person? It doesn't take scripture to suggest we should contemplate these questions; rather, it reveals a troubling inclination towards convenience and self-sufficiency when we dismiss the notion that every life might carry value, as exemplified by Jesus’ sacrifice.

Even if you don’t believe in the details of Jesus’ story, refusing to engage with its implications undermines the integrity of your dismissal.

The crucial question remains: What if the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ bear significant implications for your perspective on human life? How willing are you to engage in this discussion, or is it easier to relegate the supernatural to the realm of the absurd, too challenging for your intellect? Consider the notion that a created being might think itself capable of outsmarting its Creator.

I wonder about your views on the AI technology we’ve developed. I doubt it will ever contemplate our existence with disbelief, much like considering unicorns as real.

Chapter 2: The Inconvenience of Truth

In the first video titled "If Jesus DIED for me, then WHY do I still have to DIE?", the speaker explores the paradox of Jesus’ sacrifice and its implications for personal responsibility and mortality. The discussion delves into the emotional and philosophical ramifications of such beliefs.

The second video, "John MacArthur Says Jesus DIDN'T Die For The Sins of the World," presents a contrasting viewpoint on the extent of Jesus' sacrifice and its theological significance, prompting further reflection on the nature of salvation and human accountability.