Unveiling the Suppression of Cancer-Related Content on Medium
Written on
Chapter 1: Understanding Content Suppression
For a considerable time, I’ve been aware of the troubling trend of content suppression, particularly concerning cancer topics on Medium. This became evident to me after my recent article discussing the Warburg Effect, a popular subject in health and science circles, received virtually no readership from the platform.
As Stuart Scott wisely said, “You beat cancer by how you live, why you live, and in the manner in which you live.” Similarly, Joe Wasser reminded us, “Cancer is only going to be a chapter in your life, not the whole story.” Robin Roberts emphasized the importance of focus, stating, “Cancer is about concentrating on the fight and not the fright.” Joel Siegel offered a more positive perspective: “Cancer changes your life, often for the better. You learn what’s important, you learn to prioritize, and you learn not to waste your time.”
My journey on Medium began with great enthusiasm as I aimed to share my extensive research in health sciences and personal life lessons from retirement. I hoped to foster a nurturing space for emerging writers to find their voice.
However, after nearly two years of keen observation as a writer, reader, and editor, I have noticed a concerning pattern: only the content that aligns with Medium's preferences seems to be valued. The data tells a compelling story; it’s hard to dismiss the evidence pointing to a systematic suppression of certain topics, including cancer. As a retired scientist, I prefer to rely on data rather than conspiracy theories, which makes these findings all the more troubling.
This narrative is not a critique but rather a reflection on my experiences and observations, hoping to shed light on the situation and encourage budding writers to seek out substantive content rather than sensationalized stories that favor toxic positivity.
Section 1.1: A Love for the Medium Community
I hold a deep appreciation for the Medium community; they inspire me to share my insights and experiences. This piece is not a complaint but a heartfelt expression of my journey, especially as I focus on what truly matters in my later years. With limited time left, I aim to make meaningful contributions.
Recently, I launched a publication named Health and Science, which has surprisingly flourished, attracting contributions from over 500 writers and thousands of visitors daily. My background as a volunteer editor for various publications allowed me to witness firsthand which stories gained traction and which did not. However, one particular observation stood out: stories relating to cancer, a subject I am passionate about due to my background, often received minimal visibility.
On June 3rd, I published a detailed piece that I believed would resonate widely. Despite my efforts to adhere to Medium’s distribution guidelines, the outcome was disheartening. The article, titled "Understanding the Nuances of the Warburg Effect to Combat Cancers Better with an Open Mind," garnered merely 16 views, primarily from editors within my publication.
Many People Believe This Cancer Treatment ALWAYS Works… Here's What The Data Shows!
Section 1.2: The Struggles of Sharing Insightful Research
I’ve actively shared my work on social media, hoping to reach a broader audience. However, the limitations of Medium's access policies hindered many potential readers. The challenges became apparent when another cancer-related article I penned received only 9 views, reflecting a broader trend in the suppression of valuable content.
Despite my efforts to promote these pieces, the algorithm’s indifference to crucial topics like cancer is disheartening. The statistics reveal a troubling narrative: cancer-related articles consistently receive less visibility compared to other subjects.
Chapter 2: The Need for Fair Distribution
The Cancer Scientist: We CAN Detect Cancer Earlier by Doing This (new breakthroughs)
In my research endeavors, I’ve come across numerous articles from fellow scientists and writers that also faced similar challenges with visibility. Many stories authored by experts in the field are overlooked, while those that don't address pressing issues in cancer research seem to flourish.
As I continue my journey on Medium, I remain hopeful that meaningful stories, particularly those that can impact lives, will eventually find their rightful audience. I firmly believe in the importance of open discussions surrounding cancer, and it is my hope that my experiences contribute to a more inclusive and fair platform.
Thank you for taking the time to read my reflections. I wish you all health and longevity, and I invite those interested in health and science writing to join my publication.