# Navigating Screen Time: A Modern Parenting Dilemma
Written on
Chapter 1: The Shift from TV to YouTube
This morning, while lying in bed, I tuned into the headlines from the Today programme, which included a recent Ofcom report revealing that kids are spending less time watching traditional television and more on YouTube. However, since YouTube serves as a platform for video content, a more accurate headline might be, "Children are watching less TV, opting instead for more visual content." Meanwhile, my 11-year-old was also at home, likely engrossed in YouTube. I could infer this not from any parental monitoring system, but because if he wasn’t, I would have certainly heard about it—after all, the internet breaking down would be a catastrophe in our household.
Nostalgia seems to split people into two camps: those who simply reminisce about the joy of their youth and those who view the internet as an inherently harmful entity. This latter group often believes that everything emerging from the digital world, including the personalities shaping two generations, is also detrimental. The fears surrounding screen time—ranging from developmental delays to fostering bullying, erasing boredom, and diminishing social interactions—make parents easy targets for alarmist narratives. We recall a time when screen time was minimal, often limited to half-watching shows like Monkey, and we tend to believe that activities disconnected from screens, such as flying kites or crafting, are inherently more wholesome. Yet, someone has ingeniously managed to compile a vast array of human knowledge and activities into a single portable device.
How can we combat this? Do we even understand the challenge we face? The internal hypocrisy can be paralyzing: it’s difficult to preach about screen time when you’re holding your own device, and it feels insincere to set your phone aside momentarily to share your viewpoint. I know of two families with strict rules regarding screen time. One family, adopting a Silicon Valley approach, prohibits screens entirely and has no television. The other allows a minimal amount of screen time each day, permitting children to earn extra minutes for good behavior. The rest of us navigate this landscape in a more haphazard manner, often yielding to our children's demands, and sometimes even discovering that games like Fortnite can be quite enjoyable. As one friend humorously remarked, “We have excellent discipline in our family. We do exactly what they say. The only problem arises when we don’t comply swiftly enough.”
Section 1.1: The Influence of Vloggers
Despite my awareness, I find vloggers unsettling. I often find myself exclaiming, “This person isn’t contributing anything,” much like a stern judge critiquing a pop band. There’s a distinct trend among young male vloggers, akin to the antics of Jackass, who engage in self-harm and dangerous stunts. At least that behavior is comprehensible—it's a classic form of reckless entertainment. However, I also encounter individuals unboxing products or discussing trivial matters in what seems to be a stream of consciousness.
My daughter enjoys watching a young woman who spins elaborate narratives about fictitious encounters with homeless individuals. It leaves me pondering, what are these creators aiming to achieve? Although YouTube offers a vast array of content, for dedicated viewers, it often results in an unfiltered flow of meaningless chatter. Yet, can I definitively claim that this is any less significant than a morning radio show or the exchanges children have with one another? Am I seeking meaning for my children, or am I merely resisting the tide of modernity? It’s a genuine quandary.
Subsection 1.1.1: Rethinking Parenting in the Digital Age
Raising children today is a communal and social endeavor that we paradoxically frame as a private responsibility. Historically, when society required compliance and conformity, even the wealthiest families raised their children in harsh conditions, establishing educational systems that guaranteed such environments. In an era that valued liberty and nonconformity, the mantra became one of “benign neglect.” A dire interpretation could suggest that we now need consumers, and that’s what we’re producing: a generation of passive observers.
However, I reject that notion. We often misinterpret screens as being on the wrong side of an outdated divide between passive viewing (bad) and active engagement (good), a divide that has lost relevance since the 1990s. The tech elite have alarmed us with their no-screen policies in schools, echoing parenting philosophies from the previous century; it feels unsettling, as though they have ensnared us in an addiction only for their children to emerge as an untouched supergroup. In reality, they’ve developed a tool that can be either passive or active, educational or trivial, uplifting or stifling, because it encompasses everything. You can regulate its use, but if you do so based on the belief that screen time is categorically harmful, your children are likely to find it amusing. If your concerns persist, the most effective way to encourage kids away from screens is to engage them in hands-on activities in real life.
Zoe Williams is a columnist for The Guardian.